No, it’s not too early to talk about who should lead the Justice Department in a Harris administration—and one person stands out from the pack.

A Justice Department antitrust lawsuit against the ticket seller’s parent company, Live Nation, may well bring Republicans and Democrats together.

In oral arguments, the justices seemed highly reluctant to entangle themselves in a matter that many believe subject the neediest Americans to cruel and unusual punishment.

The Justice Department was looking into the hush-money saga. Then, suddenly, it wasn’t. Why?

In an unusual move, the Justice Department is pushing to participate in upcoming oral arguments in the hopes of influencing the high court to pick a less cruel fate for the most vulnerable Americans.

The agency’s antitrust suit aims to end the firm’s wide array of anticompetitive practices—and reopen the door to innovation.

Why did Senate appropriators cut funding for the Justice Department’s antitrust division by 20 percent? You’ll have to ask Sen. Jeanne Shaheen.

Swing-district Republicans will learn the hard way: Facts still matter, and impeachments still need to be about something.

His immunity defense isn’t merely a legal argument. He’s priming his base to back wanton lawbreaking if he wins back the White House.

The key figure in a second Trump term won't be the former president—it will be the master of the dark arts seated at his side.

Their Hunter Biden probe is about muddying the president, not finding actual corruption.

Jeffrey Bossert Clark may be gone, but his influence on the agency’s environmental work is far from forgotten.

The January 6 committee’s damning final report makes clear that the former president sought to steal the 2020 election by force. Will Merrick Garland and the Department of Justice take the baton?

Federal prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission made a strong case for the latter on Tuesday.

The Barr-appointed special counsel was supposed to reveal “the crime of the century.” All he revealed was his incompetence—and worse.

The former president seems to think the justices are going to help him. They keep showing him that they won’t.

The Florida judge’s concern for 45’s reputation is not only laughable but flies in the face of constitutional law.

It isn’t just that she’s a Trump appointee who’s hedging her bets. It’s also that special masters are unaccountable and undemocratic.

Judge Aileen Cannon, whom Trump tapped for the federal bench in 2020, threw out the rules to boost his flimsy legal defense.

As he descends into demented rants and his legal team flails in his defense, Republicans have to wonder: Just how radioactive is this all going to get?